Myths and fairy tales

31 October, 2011 at 4:51 pm (game design)

One GM, bunch of players. Players may not get to play the same characters every session.

Characters are, for example: Hunter, Moon, Wolf, Spider, Woman. Those work as both names and descriptions – Moon is exactly and only that, a moon.

(So no, you can’t play Conan the barbarian. You can’t play Conan. You can play [the] Barbarian.)

Contracts

Player characters have contracts with other characters (player and non-player alike). Contract has value at most +3. Characters may also have oaths, with value -3 or more.

When player character tries to get another character to do something, player rolls 2d6+contract (with that character). E.g. Wolf wants Forest to provide bountiful meat for its young. Man wants Star to guide him home. Spider wants to catch Sun in its web. Soldier wants her Gun to slay her enemies. So, roll this whenever you want to do something to someone or want someone to do something.

  • On 10+: They do it if you promise to do something later; +1 contract when you fulfill that promise, -1 contract if you don’t. You may deny the deal at no cost.
  • On 7-9: They do it if you first do something for them; +1 contract if you do, -1 contract if you cheat. You may deny the deal at no cost.
  • On 6-: They may or may not do it, and make a demand. If you do it, +1 contract; if you don’t do it, -1 contract.

When player character wants to use the power of another character, the player rolls 2d6+contract. This is serious magic – roll to run as Hare, shine as Sun, burn as Flame.

  • On 10+, +1 contract and the power does what you wanted.
  • On 7-9: Select one. A: The power works as desired, but -1 contract. B: The power works mostly or almost as desired, but there are complications. C: The power is of no help at all, but +1 contract.
  • On 6-: -1 contract and the power is of no help at all.

At the end of a session, each player character goes through the other player characters. Tell them to mark +1 contract if they helped you and kept to the spirit of their agreements with you, and -1 contract  if they hurt you or wiggled out of agreements with you. You may tell them both, neither, or only one, according to their play.

If contract has value +3 and it increases, then instead set it to be +1 and get a permanent power. E.g. Flame never hurts you, you can see through darkness as if the Sun always shone, your sense of smell rivals that of Dog.

Oaths

At any point, any player character may swear an oath. The character can no longer be played by the GM at all, ever. When player select their characters, they must always first select the oathsworn ones. The oath starts at the value +1. Player character can swear several oaths (though make sure they are genuinely different).

If player character breaks an oath, the player takes it off the character sheet and they get -1 to all contracts, current and future. This stacks. The character still needs to be selected first when players pick their characters.

When character accomplishes something major in accordance with their oath (i.e. gets closer to fulfilling it, or acts as a paragon to all who aspire to follow the oath), +1 oath.

At the beginning of each session (where the character is in play), -1 all oaths.

When player character uses their inherent strengths to make their oath true, roll 2d6+oath. E.g. Knight has sworn to rescue Prince and faces Dragon in fair combat.

  • On 10+: Everything goes fine or there’s complications and +1 oath.
  • On 7-9: Choose: There’s complications or -1 oath and everything goes fine.
  • On 6-: Choose: Break your oath or -1 oath and it all goes wrong.

If oath has the value -3 and would decrease, the character instead leaves play, quickly and in a miserable way.

If character ever completes an oath, then they leave play. Check the oath’s value.

  • -3 to -1: They live their life miserably after.
  • 0: And none know what became of them.
  • 1+: And they live happily ever after.
  • Higher than highest thus far: And they live in extreme bliss ever after. The player has serious bragging rights. Keep score.

When character leaves play, that particular character can never be played again by anyone.

7 Comments

  1. oberonthefool said,

    Interesting. I’d posted a few years ago my desire for a game built around Vows and Oaths, but never really did anything with it. This is a really interesting take on that idea.

    • Tommi Brander said,

      Thanks. You can think of the vows as measures of protagonism – character with lots of vows must be central to the sessions or fall.

  2. Nuurori said,

    Todella kovaa kamaa! Tää vihjaa pelityylistä, jota en oo vielä tullu kokeilleeks, mutta jota ois kiva päästä kokeileen käytännössä.

    Aion muutenkin lingota tätä aivossa ja kattoo tuleeko jotain ulos.

    • Tommi Brander said,

      Yleensä suosin perinteisempää pelityyliä, mutta tästä saattaa kehittyä jotain toimivaa. Ehkä. Ainakin eksoottista.

      Olen kirjoitellut vähän jotain suomeksi – voin lähettää sinulle, jos kiinnostaa.

      • Nuurori said,

        Laita vaan, jos on jotain mitä et pelilaudalle suoraan kehtaa laittaa.

        Sivukommenttina muuten pelattiin pari kertaa sitä 4. laitoksen deedeetä, mutta näyttäs siltä ettei aiheeseen enää palata, joten ajattelin antaa sen bookcrossing hengessä nyt pikkujoululahjaksi TYRin pikkujouluissa. Kiitoksia vielä kerran, se oli kuitenkin ihan kiinnostava tuttavuus.

        • Tommi Brander said,

          Kerkesin laittamaan koko roskan pelilaudalle, joten sieltä voi lueskella.

          Aiotko kokemuksistasi neljännen edikan parissa kirjoittaa johonkin? Eteenpäin laittaminen osoittaa oikeaa henkeä ja aloitteellisuutta.

          • Nuurori said,

            En mä varmaan sen enempää, mitä oon tullu satunnaisesti maininneeks aina siellä sun täällä muiden aiheiden lomassa. 4. laitos ei kuitenkaan muutenkaa tunnu lähtökohtasesti kiinnostavan juuri ketään.

            Sitäpaitsi noi mun huomiot perustuu kuitenkin käytännössä pelkästään pelaajan ohjekirjan lukemiseen. Muita ohjekirjoja en oo lukenu (oon selaillu tosin) ja pelikokemusta on sen kahden improvisoidun session verran. Aika hataralla pohjalla se syvä-analyysi siis olis :D

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: